🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and justification to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under consideration together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the legal representative in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”